Skip to content
PropCoater™
Menu

Haynesville Case History #2

Follow-up Haynesville results highlighting chemical-cost reduction, stage-time savings, and sustained treating rates.

Haynesville - Case History #2
Haynesville Case History #2 — Haynesville - Case History #2
  • ETX Haynesville four-well pad infill development.
  • Approximately 20% reduction in overall chemical cost.
  • Reduced fluid loading while achieving target proppant concentration.
  • Operator feedback documented consistent performance across the program.
Haynesville - Case History #2 – 6/2024
Haynesville Case History #2 — Haynesville - Case History #2 – 6/2024
  • Start stage — stable sand and slurry rates at lower chemical load.
  • Mid stage — maintained max rate with coated proppant.
  • Mid/late stage — pressure and rate held within design envelope.
Haynesville - Case History #2
Haynesville Case History #2 — Haynesville - Case History #2
  • Achieved desired max rate with lower horsepower-hours per stage.
  • Approximately 12 minutes per stage time savings observed.
  • Significant savings in HHP-hours and spread duration.

← Back to Haynesville Case Histories · Customer testimonials